<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>curlydena.com &#187; marc jacobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curlydena.com/index.php/tag/marc-jacobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curlydena.com</link>
	<description>Adventures Of A Curly Girl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
		<item>
		<title>Old Leathery Purse Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://curlydena.com/index.php/2009/07/02/old-leathery-purse-anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://curlydena.com/index.php/2009/07/02/old-leathery-purse-anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curlydena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dignity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis vuitton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc jacobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whackjob]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofacurlygirl.wordpress.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, apparently Madonna is the face of the AW &#8217;09 campaign for Louis Vuitton, the second time she&#8217;s appeared in a campaign for the luxury brand. Now, I don&#8217;t know about you, but I have absolutely no desire to see a 50 year old woman flashing her crotch to all &#38; sundry. And for those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, apparently Madonna is the face of the <a href="http://brandireland.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/madonna-to-front-louis-vuitton-ads/">AW &#8217;09 campaign</a> for Louis Vuitton, the second time she&#8217;s appeared in a campaign for the luxury brand.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t know about you, but I have absolutely no desire to see a 50 year old woman flashing her crotch to all &amp; sundry. And for those that do, I&#8217;m pretty sure there are specialist publications and websites that you can avail yourselves of which will give you er, more of what you want.</p>
<p>Apparently Madonna &amp; Marc Jacobs think I&#8217;m wrong though. They think it&#8217;s exactly the kind of thing you should be looking at. Regard.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-247" title="madona-vuitton3.jpg" src="http://adventuresofacurlygirl.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/madona-vuitton3-jpg.jpeg" alt="madona-vuitton3.jpg" width="500" height="324" /></p>
<p>Seriously like, wtf?!!?! Evoking &#8220;Old Hollywood&#8221;?!? My arse! I don&#8217;t remember Bette Davis thrusting her ladygarden at the camera in All About Eve, or Rita Hayworth showing her wares to such a degree in Gilda, and jeez, she played a stripper! Do celeb types use the phrase &#8220;evoking Old Hollywood glamour&#8221; to pretty much allow them to do anything as long as they wash out the colour a bit?!</p>
<p>For a while there I was struggling to understand why Louis Vuitton would pick someone like Madge to front a campaign for them again, so I asked Twitter, always an excellent resource for reason and logic <img src='http://curlydena.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Initially we all agreed that <em>&#8220;It&#8217;s a bit Readers&#8217; Wives&#8221;</em> and <em>&#8220;That image is just disturbing, put it away Madge&#8221;</em> along with the thought we all had, <em>&#8220;She must love her crotch, it&#8217;s everywhere&#8221;</em>.</p>
<p>But after a bit of debate it was decided that actually it&#8217;s a perfect brand association: Expensive, Exclusive, Leathery Purses. A match made in heaven!</p>
<p>Though I am going to say that only one of them can really still be considered a luxury brand these days &#8211; I mean, I&#8217;m all for a bit of vintage bargain hunting, but there&#8217;s only one of the two going to remain desirable despite years of &#8220;wear &amp; tear&#8221;. Am I wrong?</p>
<p>I am however, slightly terrified about the aspirational qualities of each and am somewhat concerned about any future trends which may involve impressionable teens going out brandishing imitation &#8220;Madge Vadges&#8221; that they bought off a market stall somewhere.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s my plea to Madge &#8211; <em>Put it away love, we&#8217;ve seen it before. It&#8217;s old and it&#8217;s boring. Yes, you may be very bendy for a (late)middle-aged bird, but are you still going to be flashing it at us when you collect your bus pass in a few years? I thought you were all about reinvention anyway &#8211; how about reinventing yourself as a woman that keeps it in her pants every now and then. Go on, try it, you might like it. I know I&#8217;ll be happier anyway!</em></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://curlydena.com/index.php/2009/07/02/old-leathery-purse-anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

